I agree with Jane
These are some of my thoughts on that issue:
I've been
a professional writer & have been traditionally published for 20 years now.
I write (almost) exclusively in the erotica market. My work has appeared
internationally, in several languages. My books are popular enough to sell-out
of their first print runs but usually do not go into a 2nd printing. USED
copies of my books continue to sell & sell & sell (no added royalties
for me, of course). When I first started out in the business, literary
underground magazines were the traditional outlets wherein erotica writers got
published, found fans, networked, then moved into traditional book publishing.
That was the route my career took. In the late 90s, however, the Internet slaughtered
the magazine trade. It greatly frustrated me, not just b/c there were fewer
publishing outlets for me, but also for my colleagues who were equally talented
genre writers. And as every professional writer knows, book deals are not easy
to get, even when you're a talented writer. But what we did was embraced the
Internet and took our work online.
I, for
one, found more fans online than I'd ever had before and it led me to a long
stream of traditional book publishing deals in several countries. When I
founded the EAA (Erotic Authors Association) in 2002, it was to help erotica
authors navigate their publishing careers. What I saw happening from the
vantage point of running the EAA until 2006, was that eBooks and DIY POD
publishing were taking off like rockets all over the Internet yet traditional
book publishers were VERY slow to see it. While this new direction was
exciting, it was also disturbing; I could hear the death knell of
traditionally-published erotica, and sure enough, it came -- quickly. It is
MUCH harder to get an erotica book traditionally published now. It is so much
easier for readers to find, purchase, and read erotica -- in all its many, many
sub genres -- online. Which is why so many erotica and erotic romance authors
have made the switch to publishing eBooks.
And what
did they find? Easier access to readers and a better royalty split between
themselves and the eBook publisher.
I
understand the allure of being traditionally published. It matters as much to
me as to any writer. But the truth is that more and more readers are flocking
to the ease of Kindles. And more and more self-published writers are finding
that their manuscripts can go from desktop to Kindle almost
"overnight" -- or at least when compared to how long it takes for a
traditionally published book to come out in the marketplace. (And if one is an
established writer, you have the added benefit of how cheaply eBooks can be
purchased; cutting into that problem of cheap used books selling over &
over with no royalties for the writer. And having the option of a POD trade
paperback or hardcover at least available along with the eBook edition, is just
a little icing on the cake. Plus it gives the writer something tangible to sell
at readings.)
When
Harlequin announced Horizons the other day, my thought was, "Wow.
Harlequin is once again at the head of the pack." As an ex-member of the
RWA, it did not surprise me that the RWA went after Harlequin so fervently.
They did the same to keep eBook publishing houses out of the RWA as long as
they could before "caving" to publishers like Ellora's Cave. I
understand the RWA and why it exists; it's why I founded the EAA: to help
writers learn how to become better writers and to protect their rights, etc.
But no one's forcing anybody to become a self-published writer. I still applaud
Harlequin for taking that step into the future. They are so freakin' BRANDED
and have such hardcore readers, that if a romance writer wants to choose that
self-published road, they would benefit HUGELY from the Harlequin brand &
targeted market. From there, the writing would have to stand on its own, as it
would anywhere else.
Like Jane Friedman, I would encourage writers who want to go the DIY road to give careful
consideration to the houses that don't ask for an upfront fee (I personally
work with LULU when I self-publish). But when one takes into account that
Harlequin Horizons is DOING AWAY with its limiting categories and opening up to
all kinds of niche categories; self-publishing under a banner like Harlequin
could put a brilliantly quirky romance writer on the map. It just seems like
too many writers are resisting the call of the future & just start frothing
at the mouth b/c they are afraid of Change. I understand how tempting it is to
want to resist the future, but I've seen the future come anyway, too many times
before.



Thanks so much for mentioning my post and offering your view.
Really interesting note about RWA's past stance on e-book publishers. I'd almost forgotten those days, but it's an important piece of history. Thanks for bringing it up!
Reply to this